Obama has moved on after declaring himself the winner of the primaries and supported by the media and the DNC. He does not think the remaining state votes are important. He has only been to Kentucky twice and thinks it is next to Arkansas so believes Clinton has the advantage. He has been to Oregon several times, but will wnt to see the Great Lakes, so did not find it necessary to have any devbates regarding the issues specific to Oregon. He voted against Oregon's energy bill. The voters are now looking at issues, performance and statements outside of speech making and they are finding out that Obama is not qualified to pass a 5th grade geography class, let alone run the Country. His argument with McCain is a distraction away from Clinton, but it is near-sighted and lacks substance. He has a great following with the younger group, but I have been talking with them and they are now saying they are not hearing answers or the how to make the hope come alive and the how to implement changes . He lacks experience, lacks on-going concern for the voters and can not discuss issues without a script in front of him. We are in serious toruble if he does become the nominee.

The polls reported by Fox new say Hillary is within 4 points of Obama in Oregon. She may pull this out !! Go Hillary.

Loing at the various selections, it appears that most of the responses were Senator Clinton supporters. Hey - Clinton wins KY (68%-32%) - Obama wins OR (59%-41%) and therefore, Senator Obama will HAVE PULLED more delegates the Clinton or the so-called benchmark/milestone of all the pledge delegates.

Since Sen. Clinton currently leads in the popular vote in the primary, it is not logical to 'count her out' as some have suggested:

* CLINTON - 16,691,639
* OBAMA - 16,648,060

Source: abcnews.go.com/politics

Also, since she appears to have a better chance against McCain according to most polls...

www.gordonwaynewatts.com/.....ryMightWin.html

www.gordonwatts.com/HowHi.....ryMightWin.html

...therefore, it is not logical to assume the superdelegates will vote for Obama.

In case people forget, let me remind you of the reason the 'Superdelegates' were created in the 1st place:

When it was discovered that the candidate with the most "pledged" delegates sometimes is not the strongest candidate for November (example: Jimmy Carter), it was decided that "superdelegates" would be created as a "correction factor":

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdelegate

superdelegates.org/Main_P.....elegate_Process

writ.news.findlaw.com/laz.....s/20080214.html

All three links look very good. Therefore, it is only logical to conclude that whomever has the best chance against McCain will be chosen by the remaining undecided Superdelegates -which is not necessarily the same candidate who has the most "pledged" delegates.

If the Superdelegate merely picked the person which their home district picked, then why even give them the right to vote? So, since they do have a choice, they should be expected to pick the candidate with the best chance of winning in November. For the Democrats, that would currently be Sen. Clinton. Observe:

1. She is ahead in popular vote
2. Polls suggest she has the better chance against McCain
3. She has more experience

That all coud change -it is a close primary.

Ooops! ~~~ The last post's links weren't "clickable" -- let me try again, lol...

Since Sen. Clinton currently leads in the popular vote in the primary, it is not logical to 'count her out' as some have suggested:

* CLINTON - 16,691,639
* OBAMA - 16,648,060

Source: abcnews.go.com/politics

Also, since she appears to have a better chance against McCain according to most polls...

www.GordonWayneWatts.com/.....ryMightWin.html

www.GordonWatts.com/HowHi.....ryMightWin.html

...therefore, it is not logical to assume the superdelegates will vote for Obama.

In case people forget, let me remind you of the reason the 'Superdelegates' were created in the 1st place:

When it was discovered that the candidate with the most "pledged" delegates sometimes is not the strongest candidate for November (example: Jimmy Carter), it was decided that "superdelegates" would be created as a "correction factor":

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdelegate

superdelegates.org/Main_P.....elegate_Process

writ.news.findlaw.com/laz.....s/20080214.html

All three links look very good. Therefore, it is only logical to conclude that whomever has the best chance against McCain will be chosen by the remaining undecided Superdelegates -which is not necessarily the same candidate who has the most "pledged" delegates.

If the Superdelegate merely picked the person which their home district picked, then why even give them the right to vote? So, since they do have a choice, they should be expected to pick the candidate with the best chance of winning in November. For the Democrats, that would currently be Sen. Clinton. Observe:

1. She is ahead in popular vote
2. Polls suggest she has the better chance against McCain
3. She has more experience

That all could change -it is a close primary, bur presently, the only thing Obama leads in is delegate count.