Obama Refuses To Defend Bombing Of Hiroshima, Nagasaki
Added 88 days ago on November 13th, 2009
President Obama was asked if it was the "right decision" to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Obama did not answer the question, instead he said he would be "honored" to visit the two cities.Defending the decision of the United States to drop nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during WWII is not a comfortable thing to do when you're in Japan. But if you're President of the United States, you must do it. Diplomatically, yes. With sympathy for the civilian victims, yes. But you must do it.But when it came time today for Barack Obama to fulfill that fundamental duty, he failed. The very first reporter [from Fuji TV] called on at the joint press conference with PBO and Japanese PM Hatoyama in Tokyo today put the question to Pres. Obama in blunt and explicit terms:JAPANESE REPORTER: What is your understanding of the historical meaning of the A-bombing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Do you think it was the right decision?
Obama took a deep breath, paused . . . and punted.
Obama took a deep breath, paused . . . and punted.
Source: newsbusters.org
To view this video, your browser must support Javascript and Flash 9.
** You do not have a browser that supports Javascript **
» Link
Top 5 Related Issues
- Should the Democrats be willing to start from scratch on a bi-partisan Health Care Cost Reform Bill?
- Are Democrats trying to hurt America or misguided?
- Would a war with Iran help or hurt Obama's reelection bid?
- Should voting rights be subject to a literacy test?
- Going forward will these tea parties grow or die in size?
Most Recent
Share This
Digg
Reddit
del.icio.us
Netscape
StumbleUpon
Furl
ma.gnolia
Newsvine
Technorati
Google
The reason they asked the question is they knew obama would NOT DEFEND America. ONE MILLION men were the losses on our side! No idea what they would have lost. Would obama say that NOT ON YOU LIFE!
The decision to drop the bombs was an important one towards ending the war and showing the evils of nuclear war. However,times have changed. Today, 65 years later it's no way to start a productive conversation with your former foes by taking it on the offensive. In simple terms: How would you feel as a Japanese leader if the American president talked critically of you and
You, james, repeat the old mantra without adding constructive thought as to why we shouldn't try toget over these things and work towards a.) stopping nuclear proliferation, b) work towards decreasing US presence in Japan and c.) Improving trade relations. It seems to me that you have a lot to learn about the basics of succesfull diplomacy.