Rationing? What rationing?
Added 283 days ago on November 24th, 2009
The distinction between cost effectiveness and clinical effectiveness will be moot if ObamaCare passes. The House bill gives the HHS task force the mandate to review "the benefits, effectiveness, appropriateness, and costs of clinical preventive services" in making its de facto insurance coverage rulings. As Mr. Reinhardt notes, "at some point soon the rising cost of American health care actually will force Americans to bring monetary costs into the analysis as well." What's really going on here is that the left knows its designs will require political rationing of care, but it doesn't want the public to figure this out until ObamaCare passes. Then it will begin the campaign to instruct the rest of us that we must follow the guidance of Princeton professors about what medical care we can receive. Americans will simply have to accept that the price of government-run health care in the name of redistributive justice is that patients and their doctors must bow to the superior wisdom of HHS task forces.
Source: online.wsj.com
» Link
Showing 1-2 of 2 comments
«
‹
1
›
»
Posted by: yaja429
7:33am, November 25th, 2009
Re: Rationing? What rationing?
It has already started ... with the new guidelines for mammograms, papsmears and prostate cancer testing. The reduction in screening is definitely for cost savings rather than for the benefit of our population.Posted by: james2044
1:29pm, November 25th, 2009
Re: Rationing? What rationing?
However Insurance companies say they will not use the new guidlines. The democrats bill requires the guidlines be used, vote democrat die young.
«
‹
1
›
»
Most Recent
Share This
Digg
Reddit
del.icio.us
Netscape
StumbleUpon
Furl
ma.gnolia
Newsvine
Technorati
Google