More DWS: Americans Really Don't Care About the Budget "Process"thelookingspoon.com
Made popular 420 days ago in Politics
townhall.com — Our buddy Debbie Wasserman Schultz appeared on Fox News last night, an occasion that typically guarantees some sort of embarrassing meltdown. True to form, when anchor Bret Baier pressed the DNC chair on why Senate Democrats haven't produced a budget in nearly 1,100 days, Wasserman Schultz informed Baier that Americans aren't "interested in" these types of "process" questions (the key bit starts at the two minute mark):
Baier does an admirable job of puncturing her dissembling, but I'd like to offer an even more comprehensive rebuttal:

(1) Even if Americans don't care about "process" questions (and their general revulsion at the backroom Obamacare dealings suggest that they sometimes do), the law cares about process. And the law requires both houses of Congress to introduce and pass budgets every year. Senate Democrats have shirked this obligation for three consecutive budget cycles.

(2) DWS says the "Romney-Ryan budget" -- see my post from yesterday -- "ends Medicare as we know it." For the umpteenth time, basic math ends Medicare as we know it. Just this week, the program's trustees put out a report confirming that Medicare's core fund will become insolvent in 2024. That's 12 years from today. If we do nothing. President Obama's non-solution is to set a government cap on Medicare spending, and enforce it through an unelected rationing panel of 15 government bureaucrats. (Although he's cynically backtracking on the first scheduled round of cuts, using a shameless maneuver to push the pain until after the upcoming election). The bipartisan Paul Ryan (R) -Ron Wyden (D) Medicare reform plan enshrined in the House-passed budget takes a patient-centered approach, premised on choice and competition. "Medicare as we know it" is changing. Period. The question is, how do we go about it. Republicans have a plan. Democrats openly admit they have no solutions to the long-term debt bomb they're refusing to defuse, but they're scrambling to assail the GOP alternative. Also, she keeps talking about the "pain" the Republican plan would inflict on Americans. You know what's painful? National insolvency. Just ask the Greeks choking on tear gas at their latest street riot.

(3) Wasserman Schultz holds up the president's budget as a serious alternative to the House-passed blueprint. Is she aware that Obama's last two budgets have been defeated 511-0 in Congress, a number that includes scores of Democrat 'no' votes? So in what possible sense is Obama's surreally awful budget a viable plan?

(4) As Breitbart's Joel Pollak pointed out on Twitter last night, DWS tries to have it both ways. When pressed on Senate Democrats' egregious and unlawful inaction, she says she's a member of the House and therefore doesn't represent Harry Reid. She's a House member, yes, but she's also the Democratic National Committee Chairwoman. She speaks for her entire party; that's literally (to borrow one of her favorite words) her job.

(5) Her fanciful "solution" to this budget mess is for both parties to "work together." Baier astutely notes that a conference committee -- in which disparate bills from each chamber are merged into one -- would serve that purpose, but the lack of a Democrat budget makes such a task impossible. DWS blithely ignores this point, and claims that the GOP simply refuses to work with President Obama. Aside from this not being true, Democrats were the ones who excluded Republicans from the Stimulus di

Posted by lastbaldeagle
46 Votes
2 Comments
ShareThis
Wyh did Obama select this Bozo as the head of the DNC?
She is the best the democRAT party has to offer.
15%
She is one of the most polarizing members of the democRAT party in the current Congress and Nancy Pelousi was far too busy trying to destroy the country on her own.
4.3%
Strictly for comedic effect. Joe Biden can't be the only clown representing the party on the national stage.
0%
All those and more. Lil' debbie is a cartoon figure that you just couldn't make up.
80%
This is not a scientific survey, click here to learn more. Results may not total 100% due to rounding and voting descrepencies.
User Comments
Posted 419 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
She articulates the Democratic points and ideology so well that she pisses you off LBE.
Posted 406 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
I REALLY PITY HER MORE THAN BEING PISSED OFF. YOU SEE SHE CANNOT STOP RECITING WHAT SHE HAS BEEN TOLD TO SAY, IF SHE COULD UNDERSTAND WHAT SHE IS SAYING SHE WOULD THROW-UP!!!
You will have 2 minutes to edit your comment.

Add your comments