North Carolina voters outlaw the recognition of any union other than heterosexual marriage2.images.theweek...
Made popular 376 days ago in Society & Religion
theweek.com — North Carolina votersoverwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment on Tuesday that makes marriage between a man and a woman the only kind of union recognized by the state. Thanks to the 60-40 vote, North Carolina is the 30th state to change its constitution to ban gay marriage, though the measure — called Amendment One — goes further than many other states' laws by also banning civil unions and domestic partnerships for both gay andstraight couples. Here, four takeaways from the vote:

Posted by Julia
79 Votes
4 Comments
ShareThis
Do you believe North Carolina's gay marriage ban is discriminatory?
Yes
48%
No
52%
This is not a scientific survey, click here to learn more. Results may not total 100% due to rounding and voting descrepencies.
User Comments
Posted 376 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
Which is why Obama says one thing & Biden says another. They want votes from both sides.
Posted 375 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
Good for all of the North Carolina Voters they held their ground!!
Posted 374 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
The perverts can do whatever they want on their own dime. Who really care what they do in private, but it is not , never was and never will be a 'marriage'! Obama is just finally coming OUT! Larry Sinclair!
Posted 374 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
"In fact, Obama has not “evolved”—he has changed his position whenever his political fortunes required him to do so. Running for the Illinois state senate from a trendy area of Chicago in 1996, he was for gay marriage. “I favor legalizing same-sex marriages,” he wrote in answer to a questionnaire back then. In 2004, he was running for the U.S. Senate and needed to appeal to voters statewide. So he evolved, and favored civil unions but opposed homosexual “marriage.” In 2008, running for president, he said, “I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage.” Now in 2012, facing a tough reelection campaign where he needs energized supporters of gay “marriage” and has disappointed them with his refusal to give them his support, he is for it. To paraphrase John Kerry, he was for it before he was against it before he was for it again. "
You will have 2 minutes to edit your comment.

Add your comments