Conservative Pundit: Obama May be Gayhttps:encrypted-t...
Made popular 371 days ago in Politics
huffingtonpost.com — The Family Research Institute's Paul Cameron has joined the chorus of dissenting voices angered by President Obama's endorsement of same-sex marriage last week.

As Right Wing Watch is reporting, Cameron denounced Obama's stance on Crosstalk with Jim Schneider of VCY America (Voice of Christian Youth), even suggesting that the president himself might be gay.

"Actually, while I’m not sure about the claims by the various people who have reported that Obama has at least participated at times with them in homosexual acts, this certainly lends some credence," Cameron noted in the clip.

After stating that "the long term goal of the homosexual movement is to get every little boy to grab his ankles and every little girl to give it a try," he added, "They will not rest until every one of our children at least gets to try, has the opportunity and maybe is forced to at least once experience homosexual acts."

Posted by AUpolls
47 Votes
5 Comments
ShareThis
Is there a real possibility that conservative Republicans could over play their hand on the "gay issue" and the President was counting on that?
There's a STRONG possibility
30%
There's A possibility
40%
There's ABSOLUTELY NO possibility
13%
There's really NO possibility
17%
This is not a scientific survey, click here to learn more. Results may not total 100% due to rounding and voting descrepencies.
User Comments
Posted 371 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
Do you mean that Obama "came out" to trap Republicans and has not "evolved" from 2008 when marriage was for a man & a woman?

How did you determine that Newsweek and The New Yorker were GOP leaning publications?

While Obama trys to fine a way to "evolve" out of this are you saying that the GOP made Obama do this?
Posted 371 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
BTW, the GOP has said NOTHING about Obama's foot in the mouth moment.

The Newsweek & New Yorker covers are "progressive" high fives. They say all that is needed to start talk even amoung the "progressive" elements.
Posted 371 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
@James No, maybe to get people to see how hateful you can be.
Posted 370 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
Who cares? Obama already had the votes of the sexual deviates, pedophiles, perverts and homosexuals. There are not that many in society to make any difference in a National election. I think it will hurt Obama among the normal people and will bring them to the polls in droves. It makes no difference to me what homos do in private, but don't try to legislate them into normalcy. It's a choice they have made.
Posted 370 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
First they came for the communists,

and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for for the trade unionists,

and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,

and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for me,

and there was no one left to speak out for me.

Now they are coming for the Catholics

---SPEAK OUT!
You will have 2 minutes to edit your comment.

Add your comments