CNN’S PIERS MORGAN CHALLENGES WASSERMAN-SCHULTZ‘S ’EXTREMIST’ CHARACTERIZATION OF GOV. WALKERstrangepolitics.com
CNN’S PIERS MORGAN CHALLENGES WASSERMAN-SCHULTZ‘S ’EXTREMIST’ CHARACTERIZATION OF GOV. WALKER
Made popular 345 days ago in Politics
theblaze.com — The Democrats are still infuriated over Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker‘s victory in this week’s historic recall election. Lamentations from Howard Dean and random, emotional protesters, among other critics, have been strong. Some might even argue that denial has set for prominent figures in the Democratic establishment. Case-in-point: DNC Chair and Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Last night, Schultz seemed unwilling to admit that Walker’s historic win was an all-out victory, as she told CNN’s Piers Morgan that it was “at least in part successful.” As Mediaite notes, though, the television host didn’t seem to be buying into her assessment of the obvious win for Republicans. Likewise, he didn’t agree with her “extremist” characterization of Walker:

“The President deployed his entire grassroots machinery on the ground in Wisconsin,” Wasserman Schultz argued, calling it “an unprecedented effort of grassroots in this recall,” though “we came up short of the ultimate goal.” She claimed that Democrats would still be able to “stop” Walker because of the gains in the State Senate, the bottom line of the night for her being that “Democrats are not going to just lie down and allow the middle class and workers to get run over.”
“You keep calling him this extremist who everyone is terrified of, but he won, he won considerably,” Morgan replied, adding that calling this “some kind of weird victory” seemed bizarre to him. “I’m certainly not going to call it a victory,” Wasserman Schultz replied, not agreeing with Morgan that this meant voters were “a bunch of angry extremists,” but that the explanation for their votes was that “voters look very differently at a recall than they do a normal election,” and for some reason they were “uncomfortable” [with] recalling Walker even though “they didn’t like his policies.

Report This Post
Posted by lastbaldeagle
Add To Favorites
20 Votes
Similar Issues
3 Comments
ShareThis
Is DWS another of Obamas' epic failures in choosing her as the head of the DNC and face of the donkey party? Why would he pick someone as inneffective as Lil' Debbie?
They needed someone with her mirror shattering and clock stopping beauty.
0%
Her mind numbing stupidity cannot be over looked.
5%
It was impossible to find someone as deranged as Mad Howie Dean.
0%
They had a hard time finding someone as slimy as Terry McAuliff.
5%
Where else could they find someone who looks like a snaggle toothed ewe?
0%
She diverts attention from the many failures of the Obama administration.
0%
All these choices and more, she was a terrible choice.
90%
This is not a scientific survey, click here to learn more. Results may not total 100% due to rounding and voting descrepencies.
User Comments
TopSpin
Posted 345 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
For the same reason you make posts about her, she's effective, articulate, and annoys the shit out of you.

Don't let this deter you from making the same kinds of posts.

Keep at it.
lightdude
Posted 344 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
@TopMoron It doesn't bother me in the least. I enjoy watching you fools believe them. LOL
lastbaldeagle
Posted 344 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
@TopSpin Hit a nerve did I? Articulate is not the ability to parrot the DNC daily talking points and yes she is annoying in the same manner as a hemorrhoid or a cockroach is annoying. You liberals consider anyone who can string two or more words together without using a TelePrompTer as articulate.

I will continue with the same kind of posts as long as they continue causing your knee to jerk.
You will have 2 minutes to edit your comment.

Add your comments