Contempt Charges Coming Down on Holder June 20No image available
Made popular 373 days ago in Politics
townhall.com — The House Oversight Committee led by Chairman Darrell Issa will vote to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt over Fast and Furious stonewalling on June 20. The vote comes after Issa offered to dismiss the charges so long as Holder complied with an October 2011 Congressional subpoena. Holder has failed to do so. The charges will require a majority vote to pass out of the committee and then will be brought to the House floor for a vote; Speaker Boehner is on board. Chairman Issa's statement:

For over a year and a half, the House Oversight Committee, with Senator Chuck Grassley, has conducted a joint investigation of reckless conduct in Operation Fast and Furious. With the support of House leadership, the Republican Conference, and even some Democratic Members who have expressed concern to the White House over the Justice Department’s failure to cooperate, this investigation has yielded significant results. The Attorney General has acknowledged that the operation was fundamentally flawed and he has committed to take steps to ensure that it does not occur again. Evidence found in applications for wiretaps shows that although senior officials were given information about reckless tactics, they still signed affirmations that they had reviewed the investigation and determined that electronic surveillance of phones was necessary.

“Despite what the investigation has uncovered through whistleblowers and documents the Justice Department had tried to hide, the Committee’s work is not yet complete. Attorney General Holder has failed to meet his legal obligations pursuant to the October 12 subpoena. House leaders reiterated this failure in a May 18, 2012, letter. Specifically, the Justice Department has refused to turn over critical documents on the grounds that they show internal Department deliberations and were created after February 4, 2011 – the date Justice issued a false denial to Congress. Contempt will focus on the failure to provide these post February 4th documents.

“The Obama Administration has not asserted Executive Privilege or any other valid privilege over these materials and it is unacceptable that the Department of Justice refuses to produce them. These documents pertain to Operation Fast and Furious, the claims of whistleblowers, and why it took the Department nearly a year to retract false denials of reckless tactics. The Justice Department’s actions have obstructed the investigation. Congress has an obligation to investigate unanswered questions about attempts to smear whistleblowers, failures by Justice Department officials to be truthful and candid with the congressional investigation, and the reasons for the significant delay in acknowledging reckless conduct in Operation Fast and Furious.

“While the Justice Department can still stop the process of contempt, this will only occur through the delivery of the post February 4, 2011, documents related to Operation Fast and Furious and whistleblower accusations subpoenaed by the Committee. If the Attorney General decides to produce these subpoenaed documents, I am confident we can reach agreement on other materials and render the process of contempt unnecessary.”

Speaker Boehner's statement:

The Justice Department is out of excuses. Congress has given Attorney General Holder more than enough time to fully cooperate with its investigation into ‘Fast and Furious,’ and to help uncover the circumstances regarding the death of Border Agent Bria

Posted by lightdude
19 Votes
2 Comments
ShareThis
What should happen to the head of DOJ (Dumbass of Jackasses)?
1. He should step down since he never belonged there in the first place.
5.3%
2. Be impeached and lifetime in prison along with “The private sector is doing fine” dumbo.
5.3%
3. Let the victim’s family decide what to do to him.
11%
4. FIRE HIS ASS and the JACKASS who put him in there!
16%
5. I'm a liberal leftests/ marxist and it would hurt my feelings if they did anything to him. I am mentally unstable and I might occupy something for some unknown reason.
5.3%
6. 1 Through 4
58%
This is not a scientific survey, click here to learn more. Results may not total 100% due to rounding and voting descrepencies.
User Comments
Posted 372 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
Leahy, Durbin, Whitehouse and Schumer are all very defensive of Holder. Aren't the first three some of the biggest detractors where Gonzales and Ashcroft were concerned and don't you find their partisan antics laughable considering their past actions?
Posted 372 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
@lastbaldeagle Yes I do. They are all a joke.
You will have 2 minutes to edit your comment.

Add your comments