Is Romney’s Massachusetts record really as bad as Obama says?washingtonpost.com
Made popular 344 days ago in Business
washingtonpost.com — “When Mitt Romney was governor, Massachusetts was Number One: Number One in state debt — $18 billion in debt, more debt per person than any other state in the country. At the same time, Massachusetts fell to 47th in job creation — one of the worst economic records in the country. First in debt, 47th in job creation: that’s Romney economics.”
-- Narration from President Obama campaign ad
President Obama’s campaign team has hammered Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts record for the past few weeks in an effort to dispel any notion that the GOP presidential candidate has proven his chops when it comes to job creation and financial stewardship — areas opponents argue that the president is weak.
Let’s see how Massachusetts fared while Romney was governor from 2003 until 2007. Did the state really distinguish itself with such unflattering numbers?

Posted by ChrisAndrews72
90 Votes
4 Comments
ShareThis
Is Romney’s Massachusetts record really as bad as Obama says?
Yes
53%
No
47%
This is not a scientific survey, click here to learn more. Results may not total 100% due to rounding and voting descrepencies.
User Comments
Posted 344 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
Obumbler should be more sympathetic. Romney inherited his problems from a multitude of liberal RATs who governed before hi. Funny how it works isn't it. Bush had a fairly decent record prior to the 2006 elections and the Reid/Pelousi Congress who BTW are the ones who actually spend the money according to the Constitution.

There is nothing on Earth as dumb as a democRAT!
Posted 344 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
@lastbaldeagle YUUUUUUUUUP! Good call.
Posted 344 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
NOOOOOOOOOOOOPE!!!! Nice try chris.
Posted 343 days ago
0 up votes, 0 down votes
Low-life cheatin' Republican??

The Presidential election in 2012 was too close to call. Neither Mitt Romney nor Obama had enough votes to win. There was much talk about ballot recounting, court challenges, etc., but a week-long ice fishing competition seemed the sportsmanlike way to settle things. The candidate that caught the most fish at the end of the week would win the election.

After much of back and forth discussion, it was decided that the contest would take place on a remote frozen lake in northern Wisconsin . There were to be no observers present, and both men were to be sent out separately on this isolated lake and return at 5 p.m. with their catch for counting and verification by a team of neutral parties.

At the end of the first day, Mitt Romney returned to the starting line and he had 10 fish. Soon Obama returned and had no fish. Well, everyone assumed he was just having a bad day or something and hopefully, he would catch up the next day. At the end of the 2nd day Mitt came in with 20 fish and Obama came in again with none.

That evening, the Democrats got together secretly and said, "I think that Mitt Romney is a low-life, cheatin' son-of-a-gun. Tomorrow, don't bother fishing. Just spy on him and see just how he is cheating."

The next night (after Mitt returns with 50 fish), the Democrats got together for the report of how the Republicans were cheating. Obama said, "You are not going to believe this, he's cutting holes in the ice!"
You will have 2 minutes to edit your comment.

Add your comments