Manage your account
Make YouPolls.com your home page
Society & Religion
Food & Drink
Made popular 2787 days ago in
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A provision of the Patriot Act that requires people who are formally contacted by the FBI for information to keep it a secret is unconstitutional, a federal judge ruled on Thursday.
U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero sided with the American Civil Liberties Union, which brought the lawsuit and argued that an FBI letter requesting information - called a National Security Letter - is effectively a gag order but without the authorization of a judge.
The FBI tells people who receive the letters to keep them secret, but recipients can challenge the secrecy order in court under a 2006 congressional amendment to the NSL law.
The law says judges must defer to the FBI's view that secrecy is necessary, undermining the judiciary's check on the power of the executive branch, the ACLU said.
Report This Post
Add To Favorites
How do you feel about the judge's ruling to strike down the Patriot Act's secrecy order?
Less secure. This compromises secrecy of an investigation
More secure. This upholds civil liberties & basic rights
This is not a scientific survey,
to learn more. Results may not total 100% due to rounding and voting descrepencies.
2788 days ago
the way I see it, if you've done nothing wrong and have nothing to hide, then you've got nothing to be concerned about.
You will have 2 minutes to edit your comment.
Add your comments
Made popular 14 days ago
What do you think?
Made popular 17 days ago
Do you think Obama is a
Made popular 22 days ago
Should the Government force a person to violate their religious teachings to protect a group’s “rights”?
Made popular 24 days ago
Which political party do you think is the most intolerant?
Made popular 28 days ago
Which group do you think is more racist?
Code of Conduct
Copyright © 2007-2015 YouPolls, all rights reserved. Designed by
, Powered by