Manage your account
Make YouPolls.com your home page
Society & Religion
Food & Drink
The day socialism comes to America
Made popular 610 days ago in
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened."
– Norman Thomas, American socialist
I've been thinking deeply about those famously prophetic words spoken by America's premier socialist thinker and leader.
They didn't resonate in the 1940s when Franklin Roosevelt, in the name of ending the Depression, exceeded all constitutional authority by approving new federal assistance programs.
They seemed a bit far-fetched to most of us in the 1960s when Lyndon Johnson vastly expanded the welfare state in his failed bid to end poverty in America.
They still didn't connect in the 1970s when Richard Nixon, in a bid to ingratiate himself with Democrats in Congress and stave off an impeachment, greatly increased spending on wealth-redistribution schemes.
And by the 1980s, with Ronald Reagan in power, it seemed this 40-year trend had finally been reversed.
But with the initiatives being proposed by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in the 2008 presidential campaign, it appears Norman Thomas was right all along. Americans will, indeed, embrace every fragment of the socialist program in the name of liberalism.
Both of the leading Democrats call for nationalized health care – for a power grab by Washington in which the federal government will seize full control of another one-seventh of the U.S. economy.
This would, of course, be the most dramatic and irreversible step toward U.S. socialism in the nation's history.
Even today, however, the architects of these plans conceal from the public the centralized, command-and-control nature of the new system they devise.
They are not asked by the press to show the American people even one successful program government has run. Yet the American people seem ready to put the lives of their children and grandchildren in the hands of Washington bureaucrats.
Now comes an even grander proposal by Barack Obama. It's called the Global Poverty Act, that would, in the next decade, transfer at least $845 billion of U.S. taxpayer money overseas. Think of Johnson's failed war on poverty going international – directed not by Americans but by the United Nations.
How we could even be debating ideas like this in the 21st century, after all of the climactic failures of socialism around the world, is amazing to me. But we're not really debating them. It seems we're not even capable as a people of debating them, reasoning over them, using our brains to consider them.
Americans may simply be too far gone spiritually, morally and intellectually to reject the temptations of socialism.
Socialism is antithetical to human nature, yet it has great appeal to the human mind.
It's one of the great lies of all time – similar to the one told by the deceiver in the Garden of Eden. You can be like God! You can have it all right here on Earth. You can live in utopia, and you don't have to obey the laws of the universe to achieve it.
That's the essence of socialism. And it is finally seducing America as it has seduced much of the rest of the world over the last century.
Unfortunately, Americans don't even have a party representing clear, unequivocal opposition to socialism. The Republicans dare not even speak its name. John McCain admits pu
Report This Post
Add To Favorites
Is a second term for Barack Obama all that's needed to fulfill Norman Thomas' prophecy?
This is not a scientific survey,
to learn more. Results may not total 100% due to rounding and voting descrepencies.
610 days ago
You can label it and brand it any way you want, but it is society as a whole that decides on what services they demand.
610 days ago
@Julia, Given your statement, the question is, of whom does society demand what it wants? More profoundly, what if the entity to whom society makes its demands refuses or is incapable of complying? While you left it out, I'm sure you'd extend your statement to say that entity is government? So, at what price will government attempt to comply and is that worth the price we'd pay?
Unfortunately, sometimes we can't have what we want even if we demand it.
My answer is that members of society must individually demand what they want from themselves. Each individual must have an equal stake in the workings of society. Demanding something from someone other than yourself should be left behind with your childhood.
609 days ago
Aaaaahhhh Julia, A unicorn in every garage and milk and honey for all God's children. Your socialist utopia is not for everyone. Some have actually taken personal responsibility for their position in life and do not require the government's munificence from cradle to grave for all their WANTS and needs.
You will have 2 minutes to edit your comment.
Add your comments
Industry Groups Urge Supreme Court To Ban EPA From Regulating CO2
Made popular 1 day 20 hr ago
Should CO2 emissions be regulated?
Can Tsarnaev be ruled an "enemy combatant"?
Made popular 26 days ago
Criminal or Enemy Combatant?
30 Reasons To Dislike Barack Obama
Made popular 17 days ago
Do you have to be a flaming Kool-Aid drinking liberal democrat to respect our failing president?
Code of Conduct
Copyright © 2007-2013 YouPolls, all rights reserved. Designed by
, Powered by